Select Page

Navigating Second Marriages and Family Provision Claims in Estate Litigation

Estate disputes involving the surviving spouse of a second marriage and the children from a deceased’s first marriage are increasingly prevalent, particularly under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). These cases challenge the balance between providing for a surviving spouse and acknowledging the rights of children from a previous marriage, often leading to complex legal considerations. Courts evaluate these disputes based on various factors, including financial needs, relationships, and the size of the estate. The outcomes hinge on specific case details, highlighting the importance of comprehensive estate planning to mitigate potential conflicts and ensure fair provision for all involved parties.

Legal and Social Expectations

Legally and socially, there is an expectation that a testator should make adequate provision for their surviving spouse, ensuring they have secure accommodation and/or income to maintain their accustomed lifestyle. Typically, a surviving spouse possesses a strong claim on their deceased spouse’s estate. However, the dilemma arises when deciding whether it is fair or appropriate to make exclusive provisions for the spouse at the expense of the children.

Case-by-Case Considerations

Disputes between a second spouse’s interests and those of the first marriage’s children are highly nuanced, requiring a detailed examination of the case’s specific facts and circumstances. The court’s decision in each case hinges on a variety of factors, taking into account both the needs of the claimant and the intentions and obligations of the deceased.

Specific Scenarios and Outcomes

  • Sole Asset Cases: If the estate’s only asset is the matrimonial home left to the surviving second spouse, it becomes challenging for a child from the first marriage to secure a favorable order without jeopardizing the surviving spouse’s accommodation, especially if the spouse is financially dependent and has contributed towards the property.
  • Significant Estates: In estates with assets beyond the family home, the court may order provision for the children if it deems appropriate, while ensuring the surviving spouse retains adequate resources.
  • Elderly Second Spouses in Short Marriages: For elderly surviving spouses from short marriages with no financial contributions to the deceased’s property, the court might consider alternate orders to balance interests, such as granting a life interest in the property to the surviving spouse with provisions reverting to the deceased’s children upon the spouse’s death.

The outcomes in these disputes are varied, depending on the specific facts and circumstances of each case, and hinge on meeting the criteria outlined in the legislation. This area of litigation underscores the delicate balancing act required to fairly address the needs and entitlements of all parties involved, guided by the principles of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW).

Navigating estate disputes? Our Accredited Specialists are here to guide you through the process.

Factors Evaluated by the Court

The court, when adjudicating family provision claims under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), considers numerous factors:

  • Financial Needs and Position: The applicant’s financial circumstances and requirements are scrutinized.
  • Relationship Dynamics: The nature of the relationship between the applicant and the deceased is considered significant.
  • Obligations of the Deceased: The extent of the deceased’s obligations towards the applicant or others is evaluated.
  • Estate Size: The overall size of the estate comes under review.
  • Competing Beneficiaries: The interests and positions of any other beneficiaries are considered.
  • Health and Age: The applicant’s health and age are relevant factors.
  • Contributions to the Estate: Any contributions by the applicant to the deceased’s estate are acknowledged.
  • Deceased’s Wishes: Evidence of the deceased’s intentions regarding the distribution of their estate is considered.
  • Maintenance by the Deceased: Whether the applicant was financially maintained by the deceased is relevant.
  • Applicant’s Character and Conduct: The character and conduct of the applicant may be taken into account.
  • Other Relevant Matters: Any other matter deemed relevant by the court is also considered.


Need expert advice on family provision claims? We’re here to help.

Frequently Asked Questions

Navigating the complexities of estate litigation, especially in the context of second marriages and family provision claims, can be a daunting process for many individuals. The dynamics of modern family structures often lead to disputes that require a delicate balance of legal knowledge, empathy, and fairness. These Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) are designed to shed light on some of the most common concerns and inquiries that arise in this sensitive area of law. They aim to provide clarity on the rights and obligations of surviving spouses from second marriages, children from a deceased person’s first marriage, and how the courts attempt to balance these competing interests under the framework of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW). Whether you are a surviving spouse seeking to understand your entitlements or a child from a first marriage looking to assert your rights, this guide seeks to offer valuable insights and practical advice for navigating the complexities of family provision claims and estate litigation.

What rights does a surviving spouse from a second marriage have in estate litigation?

In Australia, second spouse inheritance rights are an important aspect of estate law, ensuring that surviving spouses have a strong claim on their deceased spouse’s estate, especially in cases where the Will leaves little to no provision for them. The legal framework in Australia mandates that a testator must make adequate provisions for their surviving spouse, a principle that is crucial in safeguarding the financial security and well-being of the second spouse. This requirement is particularly significant in the context of second marriage inheritance issues in Australia, where the balance between honouring the rights of a second spouse and addressing the expectations of other beneficiaries can be complex. 

Can children from a first marriage contest a Will if they are left out?

Yes, if a father or mother leaves everything to second wife, then children from a first marriage can file an application under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) for provision or further provision from their deceased parent’s estate if they believe they have not been adequately provided for in the Will.

What factors does the Court consider in family provision claims?

The Court considers various factors, including the financial needs of the applicant, their relationship with the deceased, the size of the estate, and any contributions made by the applicant to the deceased’s estate, among others.


How does the Court balance the interests of a surviving second spouse against the children from a first marriage?

The Court evaluates the specific facts and circumstances of each case, including the financial needs and contributions of the surviving spouse and the children’s entitlements, to reach a fair decision.

What happens in cases of second marriage home ownership when the estate’s only asset is the family home?

When the estate’s sole asset encompasses the family home under second marriage home ownership scenarios, navigating inheritance disputes becomes particularly complex. If the deceased left the family home solely to the surviving spouse from their second marriage, children from the deceased’s first marriage face significant legal hurdles in securing a portion of the estate. The intricacies of second marriage home ownership often mean that any attempt to alter the distribution in favour of the first marriage’s children not only challenges the survivor’s security but raises ethical concerns about displacing a surviving spouse. This situation highlights the importance of using one of our accredited specialists in Family Law to handle your case, as there is a delicate balance the courts must maintain between honouring the deceased’s wishes and addressing the equitable interests of all heirs, especially when the homestead represents the entirety of the estate’s assets.

Can a surviving second spouse be ordered to provide for children from the deceased’s first marriage?

The Court can make various orders to ensure fair provision for all parties involved. In some cases, this might include giving the surviving spouse a life interest in the property or a right to reside there, with the property reverting to the deceased’s children upon the spouse’s death.

What if the surviving second spouse is elderly and the marriage was short?

The Court may consider the duration of the marriage, the spouse’s financial contributions, and their age. In such cases, alternative orders might be made to balance the interests of the surviving spouse and the deceased’s children.

How are significant estates handled differently?

If the estate includes more than the family home, the Court may allocate part of the estate to provide for the children from the first marriage while ensuring the surviving spouse retains enough assets to live comfortably.

Accredited Family Law Specialist

Members of our senior legal team are accredited Family Law Specialists. In the legal profession an Accredited Specialist is a practising solicitor who has demonstrated specialised competence in a particular area of law and has been conferred Specialist Accreditation by the Law Society under its Specialist Accreditation Scheme. Edwards Family Lawyers is a highly experienced specialist family law firm that has 3 accredited specialists working out of our offices in Sydney CBD and North Sydney.

Our Family Law Services

Icon for Family Law Service divorce, divorce Sydney, Divorce NSW icon

Divorce & Separation

Experienced Divorce Lawyers in Sydney

When married couples separate, there is only one ground for the grant of a Divorce Order, and that is the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. This is established by the parties being separated for a minimum of 12 months prior to Divorce. In some circumstances, parties can be living under the same roof and still be able to establish this ground.

Icon for Family Law Service Property Settlement, property settlement sydney icon

Property Settlement

Expert property settlement lawyers

Edwards Moloney Family Lawyers can assist you and your spouse/partner to come to an agreement in relation to all financial matters and issues arising from the breakdown of a relationship, including the division of all assets and liabilities, spouse maintenance payments, superannuation splitting orders and child support departure Orders.

Negotiation and resolution family lawyer icon for Sydney NSW

Negotiation & Resolution

Expert negotiation and resolution lawyers

Opportunities for negotiation and settlement exist not only before proceedings are commenced, but also after proceedings have been commenced and right up until the time that the Court finally hears and determines the matter. Parties can settle a matter at any time.

General family lawyer icon for Sydney NSW

Parenting & Children

Parenting and Children Family Lawyers

The best interests of the children is the paramount consideration when determining the most appropriate and suitable arrangements for the children after a separation. At Edwards Moloney Family Lawyers, we encourage our clients to participate in the counselling or mediation services available to assist them to reach an agreement with their spouse/former partner

home page Icon for mediation family law services, sydney mediator

Mediation Services

Mediation Lawyers

Edwards Moloney Family Lawyers offer Mediation Services to assist parties to engage in effective dispute resolution. Our Principal, Frances Edwards, has extensive experience in negotiating settlements in both parenting and property matters, and is a National Accredited Mediator and member of LEADR and IAMA.

De-facto family law icon for Sydney NSW

De Facto

De Facto Lawyers

De Facto couples (including same sex couples) who separate after 1 March 2009 have the same rights as married couples. The rights and obligations of couples upon the breakdown of a Marriage or De Facto relationship are now all governed by the Family Law Act 1975. De Facto couples who separated prior to 1 March 2009 are still covered by the old State legislation


We are a leading family law firm in Sydney with over 30 years of award-winning experience in matters relating to complex family law matters. We are a full-service family law firm with a rich history of helping clients with complex property settlements, divorce law, divorce negotiations, child custody and mediation services. Our law firm has a strong focus on providing expert specialist advice relating to Family Law following the breakdown of your marriage or de facto relationship.

Schedule a call back

11 + 8 =

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

family law sydney

We acknowledge the Cammeraygal and Gadigal people being the traditional owners of the land on which we work and their elders past and present.